From: Mas Kato (loomis_towcar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Apr 03 2002 - 18:29:50 GMT-3
[demime could not interpret encoding binary - treating as plain text]
Guy,
Although router1 is certainly an ASBR, it really doesn't become an ABR until it
becomes a member of two or more OSPF areas. If you hung another OSPF-speaking
router off of router1 and placed it in an area different from router5, you woul
d then see the results of your 'area range' command on that new router, because
that new router would know how to read the type 3 summary LSAs being originate
d by router1.
Regards,
Mas Kato
https://ecardfile.com/id/mkato
> "Lupi, Guy" <Guy.Lupi@eurekaggn.com> "'ccielab@groupstudy.com'" <ccielab@grou
pstudy.com>Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 14:44:12 -0500
>Reply-To: "Lupi, Guy" <Guy.Lupi@eurekaggn.com>
>
>I know this has been covered in detail before, I just want to verify
>something. I have the following:
>
>router2---------router1--------router5
>
>Router 5 and router 1 are OSPF, router 2 and router 1 is igrp only. I know
>how to use the secondary address, tunnel, and route-map methods. I know how
>to use summary address on router 1 to get connected routes that are not in
>OSPF onto router 2. I cannot get routes from router 5 to router 2 using
>area range on router 1. Router 1 is an ASBR, and an ABR. I cannot use the
>area range command to get the route from r5 to r2, and summary address would
>never work, but tunnels, route-maps, and secondary addresses work. I
>thought that if the router was an ABR, you could do "area-range [area route
>is from] x.x.x.x x.x.x.x". Thanks.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:53 GMT-3