From: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi (mamoor@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Apr 03 2002 - 10:19:04 GMT-3
isnt ur accesslist is equal to :
access-list 100 permit tcp any eq 2065 any eq 2065
access-list 100 permit tcp any eq 1981 any eq 1981
access-list 100 permit tcp any eq 1982 any eq 1982
access-list 100 permit tcp any eq 1983 any eq 1983
or ur access-list is just becase or request and respond on any port below
1023
2065 source can hit to any port
1981 source can hit to any port
1982 source can hit to any port
1983 source can hit to any port
any source can hit to 2065
any source can hit to 1981
any source can hit to 1982
any source can hit to 1983
Please clear me on that.
-Mamoor
----- Original Message -----
From: John Elias <jelias_@hotmail.com>
To: <gardiner@sprint.net>; <acarswell@nc.rr.com>; <carlphelan@hotmail.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 1:03 AM
Subject: Re: Custom Queueing
> access-list 100 permit tcp any any eq 2065
> access-list 100 permit tcp any any eq 1981
> access-list 100 permit tcp any any eq 1982
> access-list 100 permit tcp any any eq 1983
> access-list 100 permit tcp any eq 2065 any
> access-list 100 permit tcp any eq 1981 any
> access-list 100 permit tcp any eq 1982 any
> access-list 100 permit tcp any eq 1983 any
>
> !
> queue-list 1 protocol ip 1
> queue-list 1 protocol bridge 2
> queue-list 1 protocol ip 3 list 100
> queue-list 1 queue 1 byte-count 2048
> queue-list 1 queue 2 byte-count 1024
> queue-list 1 queue 3 byte-count 1024
>
> John E.
> CCIE #8150
>
>
> >From: Jason Gardiner <gardiner@sprint.net>
> >Reply-To: Jason Gardiner <gardiner@sprint.net>
> >To: "Todd Carswell" <acarswell@nc.rr.com>, "Carl Phelan"
> ><carlphelan@hotmail.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: Re: Custom Queueing
> >Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 14:38:25 -0500
> >
> >Remember that protocol DLSW is only used for FST. Otherwise if you're
> >using
> >TCP, you need to have an access list specifying the ports 1981, 1982,
1983
> >and 2065, I believe.
> >
> >
> >
> >On Monday 01 April 2002 14:07, Todd Carswell wrote:
> > > Carl,
> > >
> > > I forgot to address the rest of your custom queue list...
> > >
> > > Here's what you were using:
> > >
> > > queue-list 1 protocol ip 0
> > > queue-list 1 protocol bridge 2
> > > queue-list 1 protocol dlsw 3
> > > queue-list 1 queue 1 byte-count 6000 limit 2048
> > > queue-list 1 queue 2 limit 512
> > > queue-list 1 queue 3 limit 256
> > >
> > >
> > > Here's what I think you need to use:
> > >
> > > queue-list 1 protocol ip 1
> > > queue-list 1 protocol bridge 2
> > > queue-list 1 protocol dlsw 3
> > > queue-list 1 queue 1 byte-count 6000
> > > queue-list 1 queue 2 byte-count 3000
> > > queue-list 1 queue 3 byte-count 3000
> > >
> > > In your config, you assigned ip to queue 0 when it should have been
> > > assigned to queue 1 to make it match the rest of the queue-list
> >commands.
> > >
> > > Hope that helps!
> > >
> > > Todd
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Carl Phelan" <carlphelan@hotmail.com>
> > > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 12:07 PM
> > > Subject: Custom Queueing
> > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > Can anyone tell me if this custom queue list is ok to allocate 50%
of
> > > > bandwidth to IP, 25% to bridging and 25% to dlsw considering IP has
a
> > > > packet size of 2048, bridging a packet size of 512 and dlsw a packet
> > > > size of 256?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > queue-list 1 protocol ip 0
> > > > queue-list 1 protocol bridge 2
> > > > queue-list 1 protocol dlsw 3
> > > > queue-list 1 queue 1 byte-count 6000 limit 2048
> > > > queue-list 1 queue 2 limit 512
> > > > queue-list 1 queue 3 limit 256
> > > >
> > > > Many thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Carl
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:52 GMT-3