From: Mike Coffin (mikecoffin01@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Apr 02 2002 - 01:48:55 GMT-3
I believe that frame-relay voice bandwidth established the min bandwidth for
voice traffic, and rtp priority establishes the max bandwidth. But it is a
good question whether I actually need both because his is the only example
I've seen that has both.
Regards,
-Mike
>From: "Bill Greenwood" <billgreenwood@earthlink.net>
>Reply-To: "Bill Greenwood" <billgreenwood@earthlink.net>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Solie- Voice bandwidth and rtp priority
>Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 21:13:00 -0500
>
>In reading Solie (page 439)
>
>I'm looking at his example for VoIP. Two statements I don't understand.
>I'm
>thinking you need one or the other not both. I would use the rtp priority
>command since it reduces the packet size and thus the serialization delay.
>
>map-call frame-relay voice
> frame-relay voice bandwidth 78000
> frame-relay ip rtp proirity 16384 16383 312
>
>The voice bandwidth 78000 reserves 78K for voice traffic
>the rtp priority reserves 312K for voice traffic.
>
>What am I missing? It seems the two statements are in conflict. Can
>someone
>explain?
>
>Bill
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:51 GMT-3