From: dwhitley@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon Apr 01 2002 - 16:56:34 GMT-3
Kurt,
Here it my thoughts on this.
TCP Encapsulation (use the tcp port #'s)
FST Encapsulation (still looking)
Direct Encapsulation (use the dlsw protocol type)
On Frame-relay Specifying pass-thru implies that the traffic is not locally
acknowledged. Leaving pass-thru off causes the traffic to be locally
acknowledged, which means it is transported in LLC2 to ensure reliable
delivery. "I found this statement on a Cisco document, but I have found
configuration examples from Cisco that contradict this. I will set this up
in my lab and test."
LLC2 Encapsulation (DLSw Lite) (use the llc2 protocol type)
Here is a link to Cisco about DLSW Bandwidth Management and Queuing
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/ibsw/ibdlsw/tech/dls5_rg.htm
-----Original Message-----
From: Kurt Claes [mailto:Kurt.Claes@inseurop.com]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 9:50 AM
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: prioritization DLSw
Hi group,
I've been playing around with different queuing strategies, and I have the
following question :
If they ask you to prioritize DLSw traffic (and DLSw is using TCP encap.),
what would you say in your list ?
e.g. priority list 1 protocol dlsw high,
or
priority list 1 protocol ip high tcp 2065 ??
thx in advance,
Kurt
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:51 GMT-3