From: Muhamamd Durrani (dan_schaw@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Mar 28 2002 - 21:45:37 GMT-3
Hi Mamoor ,
This is timers tuning ! Not the ans of the question
...
Pls read mail from scratch and the guy has very valid
reason of varying update timer ! and its effects on
network !
Regards,
--- Ahmed Mamoor Amimi <mamoor@ieee.org> wrote:
> timer basic 5 10 10 10
>
> done this many time...
>
> -Mamoor
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Muhamamd Durrani <dan_schaw@yahoo.com>
> To: Nicolai Gersbo Solling <nicolai@cisco.com>; CCIE
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:01 AM
> Subject: Re: Tuning IGRP timers IGRP
>
>
> > Is there any GraceFull restart process for IGRP as
> we
> > have for OSPF !!!!
> > Let me check RFC and will get back to you !
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> > --- Nicolai Gersbo Solling <nicolai@cisco.com>
> wrote:
> > > Hi there gang...
> > >
> > > I have this scenario:
> > >
> > > R1---ETH---R2
> > > Backup interface is ISDN...
> > >
> > > I am running IGRP between R1 and R2...
> > > The thing I wan't to do is to tune the IGRP
> process
> > > so that it does not take
> > > more then 5 seconds from when the primary link
> goes
> > > down untill the routing
> > > table is complete again...
> > >
> > > I know I need to do this with the timers basic
> > > command under the IGRP
> > > process, but I am doubtfull on what to set them
> > > to...
> > >
> > > The obvious would ofcourse be:
> > >
> > > update interval: 5 sec.
> > > Invalid: 15
> > > holdown: 15
> > > and flush: 45
> > >
> > > But...will this not mean that I will be clogging
> up
> > > the link with updates?
> > >
> > > Is there a more elegant way of doing it?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Nic
> > >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:24 GMT-3