From: Jack S (prospectccie@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Mar 21 2002 - 16:00:52 GMT-3
OOps sorry!!!
.1 .2
R1----eth---R2----to----R3
netw: 192.168.1.0/24
In the above setup, like you said, multiring all is
required on R3 NOT on R2.
Thanks,
Jack
--- "Chua, Parry" <Parry.Chua@compaq.com> wrote:
> Do you mean w/o "multiring all" at R2, it don't work
> ? It router 2 setup with " no ip routing" ?
>
> About your 2nd query, token ring may still have
> problem with IP(L3) mutlicast in mac address(L2) as
> it may use broadcast instad of multicast. OSPF using
> IP multicast address.
>
> The interface paramaters such as mtu and others must
> agree on OSPF to form neigh.
>
> Do debug at both routers and see what they send out
> on the interfaces...
> Verify all this and you may need to change some of
> these parameters of network type to make it work...
>
> Parry Chua
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jack S [mailto:prospectccie@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:44 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com; Chua, Parry
> Subject: RE: RE: SR/TLB issue
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////
> Hi Parry,
> It worked with multiring on R2. Thankyou very much.
> Looks like broadcast mesgs are not sent over SR/TLB.
> R1 & R3 are not able to form OSPF neighbor
> relationship. Is this the right behaviour?
>
> Thanks,
> Jack
>
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:16 GMT-3