From: Joe Higgins (netsat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Mar 21 2002 - 13:07:05 GMT-3
Is the following bgp route reflector configuration valid and/or good
practice?
r1, route reflector, > r2, route reflector client, > r3 route reflector
client. I have read that the route reflector topology should match the
physical topology of the network. In the above example it does not
match as router r3 must go through r2 to get to its route reflector,
r1. Any insight will be appreciated..
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:16 GMT-3