RE: DLSW+

From: Williams, Glenn (WILLIAMSG@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Mar 21 2002 - 11:12:08 GMT-3


   
I know this one is old, but how do you test DLSW w/o PCs? I can never get a
windows pc to communicate off a T/R interface w/o adding the bridge group to
the T/R interface. This puts it into the transparent bridge group same as
Ethernet port which is cheating. There are some router DSPU commands or
something like that where I connect another router to simulate traffic.
Anyone got the skinny on these commands to make life easier?

GW

-----Original Message-----
From: Chua, Parry [mailto:Parry.Chua@compaq.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:22 AM
To: Leonardo Pereira; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: DLSW+

If you have a doc cd, refer to

http://127.0.0.1:8080/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ibm_c/bcprt1
/bcdsrb.htm

There is a section on SRTLB, ethernet has to look like a ring as far as
source route bridgeing is concern. Cisco implement a pseduo ring to
represent the whole ethernet bridge group and assisn a number by you.

In order to remember the syntax, I make use of the first two keyword :

sourece-bridge transparant sb_vr tb_vr sb_br# tb_bg#
* # * # * #

Parry Chua

-----Original Message-----
From: Leonardo Pereira [mailto:lpereira@br.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 1:23 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: DLSW+

Parry,

Could you please explain a little bit more about the 99 value ? What do
you mean with Pse ring ?
I understood the others values because they are well-know parameters.

And what about the command:
bridge 2 bitswap-layer3-addresses

Do I have to use it for the canonical/non-canonical translation ?

Regards,
Leonardo.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:16 GMT-3