From: Richard Wheat (rwheat@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Mar 19 2002 - 04:29:30 GMT-3
I would interpret it to mean - configure a TrCRF with vlan id 100 (ring
number has
not been specified) under a TrBRF with bridge number 14 (0x0E) (vlan id has
not
been specified).
HTH,
Richard.
Carl Phelan wrote:
> So when asked to configure say VLAN 100 with bridge 14, would 14 in hex
> form = E go under the TrBRF and the VLAN ID 100 under 100 and is the
> ring number also 100 but in form hex = 64? Or can the ring number be
> different or is it dependant on something else?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> MADMAN
> Sent: 18 March 2002 19:33
> To: MOLINA, MARTIN J *Internet* (PBI)
> Cc: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: Re: Easy 3920 Question
>
> The TRBRF is arbitrary in that it's number is that it's an internal
> bridge function that is used to interconnet rings, CRFs. Whereas CRF's,
> if other bridges/routers are connected are not arbitrary since the ring
> numbers obviously must agree.
>
> Dave
>
> "MOLINA, MARTIN J *Internet* (PBI)" wrote:
> >
> > Group,
> > I just wanted to check to see if I understand VLAN numbers as they
> relate to
> > TRBRF's and TRCRF's. The literature I have reviewed seems to suggest
> that
> > the TRBRF VLAN ID is arbitrary and that the TRCRF VLAN number is the
> one
> > that counts. Even examples in Practical Studies suggests throwing any
> old
> > number on the TRBRF and "assigning a unique" VLAN number on the TRCRF.
> Any
> > input would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Martin Molina
> > Senior Network Engineer
> > Pacific Bell Internet Services
> > CCNP CCDP
> > desk: 925 973-7774
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:13 GMT-3