From: Vincent Lee (mcne95@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Mar 15 2002 - 18:40:02 GMT-3
Do you know PacBell and Qwest BGP Policy?
I got the Sprintlink's BGP Policy from their website.
http://www.sprint.net/policy/bgp.html
thanks
--- MADMAN <dmadlan@qwest.com> wrote:
>
> I disagree. I have done several Internet
> connections where one
> provider announces /24's of another, no problem.
> It's the primary factor
> in the growth of the Internet routing table.
>
> Dave
>
> Wade Edwards wrote:
> >
> > To get a true backup you have to apply for your
> own address space that
> > you can announce to both PacBell and Qwest. If
> you are using address
> > space from both PacBell and Qwest then they will
> not allow you to
> > announce their addresses through a different
> provider. You can ask if
> > they will but this is usually against their
> routing policy. So you
> > don't need BGP. Just use static routing.
> >
> > L8r.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Vincent Lee [mailto:mcne95@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:49 AM
> > To: Brian Lodwick; dmadlan@qwest.com
> > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: OT: Change primary ISP from
> PacBell to Quest
> >
> > We are using the PacBell and already ordered the
> Qwest
> > Circuit.
> > Two perimeter routers configed with HSRP and they
> are
> > only connect to Pacbell at this moment.
> >
> > We are going to keep PacBell as secondary with a
> > smaller bandwidth. Qwest will be the primary
> inbound
> > Web traffic.
> >
> > My first step is asking PacBell and Qwest for AS
> > peering info then I'll apply for our own AS from
> ARIN.
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > --- Brian Lodwick <xpranax@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > I would suggest you replace the Qwest circuit
> with
> > > another provider so that
> > > you get some support if it goes down.
> > >
> > > >>>Brian
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: MADMAN <dmadlan@qwest.com>
> > > >Reply-To: MADMAN <dmadlan@qwest.com>
> > > >To: Vincent Lee <mcne95@yahoo.com>
> > > >CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > >Subject: Re: OT: Change primary ISP from
> PacBell to
> > > Quest
> > > >Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 09:35:29 -0600
> > > >
> > > > You mean Qwest ;)
> > > >
> > > > Reading between the lines are you currently
> > > connected to PacBell? If
> > > >so I would set up the BGP connection with them
> > > first, make sure they get
> > > >rid of the static routing of your network.
> Bring
> > > up the Qwest
> > > >connection. Then you could establish the IBGP
> > > connection between the
> > > >two. Are you doing HSRP between the two
> routers
> > > that you defaulting to
> > > >internally?
> > > >
> > > > Just a couple of ideas based on limited
> info.
> > > >
> > > > Dave
> > > >
> > > >Vincent Lee wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I am going to setup a redundancy multihomed
> BGP
> > > > > network with two separate ISPs - PacBell and
> > > Quest.
> > > > >
> > > > > Here is my plan.
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. setup BGP in our company's perimeter
> routers
> > > > >
> > > > > 2. connect to Pacbell and Quest autonomous
> > > system
> > > > >
> > > > > 3. Change primary DNS server from PacBell to
> > > Quest in
> > > > > Network Solutions/VeriSign
> > > > >
> > > > > 4. Change our Web IP address in Network
> > > > > Solutions/VeriSign and point smtp relay
> > > servers to
> > > > > Quest.
> > > > >
> > > > > Any suggestions are welcome and appreciated.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:10 GMT-3