Re: Never mind ... Re: BGP and OSPF Router-ID

From: Robert L. DuBell (bobdu11@xxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Mar 15 2002 - 11:55:43 GMT-3


   
Sounds like a "foundrey" device....
----- Original Message -----
From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <hcb@gettcomm.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 7:08 PM
Subject: Re: Never mind ... Re: BGP and OSPF Router-ID

> At 11:42 AM -0500 3/15/02, John Neiberger wrote:
> >I didn't realize that the site I was looking at wasn't talking
> >about Cisco router configuration. It's a Cisco *competitor*
> >who has designed their CLI to be just about identical to
> >Cisco's. It's almost indistinguishable from the Cisco CLI.
> >
> >Sneaky, sneaky....
> >
> >John
>
> The whole CLI situation is ironic. Now, I'm not faulting Cisco here
> for developing a language that was appropriate for the time it was
> developed. But as there began to be an installed base, customers
> would demand "CLI" on any router. I remember, at Nortel, having
> customers demand to have show commands for Cisco-specific hardware.
>
> Juniper and GateD control languages have a distinct resemblance; both
> show their ancestry in UNIX. I happen to think their nested
> structures are better for describing complex constructs. Bay BCC
> (NOT site mangler) also is similar. All these languages are more and
> more compatible with object-oriented specification, as in Routing
> Policy Specification Language.
>
> Where GateD is Juniper-like (or it can be argued the reverse is more
> true), Zebra is very much Cisco-like.
>
> >
> >
> >
> >---- On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, John Neiberger (neiby@ureach.com)
> >wrote:
> >
> >> I was just reading some material from a website (not CCO)
> >that
> >> has an explicit warning that states if we change the BGP
> >router
> >> ID using the 'bgp router-id' command, this changes the router
> >> ID for both BGP _and_ OSPF and causes both processes to
> >restart.
> >>
> >> I don't have a way to test this at work or I'd do it right
> >now
> >> just to verify it. Is this really the case?
> >>
> >> I don't recall this happening before, but I don't usually
> >hard-
> >> set the BGP router ID. However, I usually hard-set the OSPF
> >> router ID. Does changing it manually have an effect on the
> >BGP
> >> router ID as well?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> > > John
>
> --
> "What Problem are you trying to solve?"
> ***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not
> directly to me***
>
****************************************************************************
****
> Howard C. Berkowitz hcb@gettcomm.com
> Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications
http://www.gettlabs.com
> Technical Director, CertificationZone.com http://www.certificationzone.com
> "retired" Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:10 GMT-3