From: RSiddappa@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri Mar 15 2002 - 13:59:10 GMT-3
When u use any kind of network command, BGP wants u to put the network
address as it appers in ur routin tbale, so what mannan is saying is right.
R.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mannan Venkatesan [mailto:mv_lab@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Joe Jia; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: BGP Backdoor
Have you tried it with 'mask' option???
Mannan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Jia" <ellenjjl@rogers.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 10:04 AM
Subject: BGP Backdoor
> I find on BGP, network x.x.x.x backdoor is not functional when x.x.x.x is
a
> VLSM network.
>
> say 192.168.1.32/28, when it can be received via ospf and bgp, when I put
> netowk 192.168.1.32 backdoor, I still receive the route via eBGP
>
> Could someone help me to solve this?
>
> Thx
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:09 GMT-3