From: dwhitley@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri Mar 15 2002 - 12:31:50 GMT-3
I have to agree, this doesn't work for me either. The only way I can get
area range to work is if the router is an ABR, this can be accomplished with
a virtual link though. It doesn't work on an ASBR either, unless the router
is an ABR as well.
Dean
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Wheat [mailto:rwheat@ami.com.au]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 9:01 AM
To: Chua, Parry
Cc: Williams, Glenn; EdmondsSG@aol.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: area 0 summarization - yes or no..
Well...
It doesn't seem to work for me in 12.1(5)T10 - nothing happens. I did a
debug of everything OSPF and reset the process, also tried a reboot. The
command seems to be ignored when used in this way.
HTH,
Richard.
"Chua, Parry" wrote:
> I have not try this, based on the logic, in area 1, you will receive all
other areas route in the form like a distance vector, so when you in area 1
internal router and do area x range, it is for it self to use but not for
others. Well, I learn some thing...but will test it some day.
>
> > Parry Chua
> >
> >
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Williams, Glenn [mailto:WILLIAMSG@PANASONIC.COM]
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 9:40 PM
> To: Williams, Glenn; Chua, Parry; EdmondsSG@aol.com;
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: area 0 summarization - yes or no..
>
> Let me clarify on this because you may misunderstand. Not trying to
appear
> as know-it-all because I'm far from that. But I've seen this work. Go to
a
> router that is totally in area 1 (any non-zero area) and issue the command
> "area 0 range xxxx" That's right area 0 range in a router that is totally
> not in area 0. Do it for a route that originated in area 0 Watch what
> happens. You will see the summarization you are trying to create.
> GW
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Williams, Glenn
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 7:17 AM
> To: 'Chua, Parry'; EdmondsSG@aol.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: area 0 summarization - yes or no..
>
> Not true. You can issue this command on a non ABR and it will work.
> GW
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chua, Parry [mailto:Parry.Chua@compaq.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 5:10 AM
> To: EdmondsSG@aol.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: area 0 summarization - yes or no..
>
> I have done several test, answer is yes, you can in theory and both
> practical.
>
> (R1)-<area 1>-(R2,abr)-<area 0>-(R3,abr)-<area 2>-(R4)
> <--- (area 2, area 0 summary)
> ( area 0, area 1 summary)-->
>
> area range alwasy done at ABR....
>
> Regards
> Parry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: EdmondsSG@aol.com [mailto:EdmondsSG@aol.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 6:34 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: area 0 summarization - yes or no..
>
> I 'm abit confused by posts at groupstudy and what I've read in a number
of
> books..
>
> Q. can you use the area XX range xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx command to summarize
> routes
> in area 0 ?
>
> some books - doyles tcp/ip vol1 /caslow say you can, but the recenet lab
> studies book says you can't !!
>
> I say that you can because i've used it in ios 12.1 and earlier to solve
the
>
> flsm to vlsm dilemma when redistributing between ospf and igrp. Maybe it
> does work but i'm missing some lurking issues that i'm not aware of yet.
> Also
> an automatic summary is now created to null0 !! i'm sure it didn't do
> that
> b4 either.....
>
> any thoughts ?
>
> Si
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:09 GMT-3