From: RSiddappa@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu Mar 14 2002 - 13:43:21 GMT-3
Insted of this if some one can work on it and post the configs then it will
prove some point. Every one has seen working some how some where. But with
so many stuff to undertsnd and remeber it is quite possible that we miss
some thins.
I would have done the test, but runnignshort of time guys. Probably I will
after few days.
thanks,
R.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi [mailto:mamoor@ieee.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 10:05 AM
To: EdmondsSG@aol.com; WILLIAMSG@panasonic.com; Parry.Chua@compaq.com;
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: area 0 summari
zation - yes or no..
Yes they are fed-back but will not cause any harm
as other routers surely will have more specific routes then the summary.
so will continue routing as normal with more specific.
-Mamoor
----- Original Message -----
From: <EdmondsSG@aol.com>
To: <mamoor@ieee.org>; <WILLIAMSG@panasonic.com>; <Parry.Chua@compaq.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 8:32 PM
Subject: Re: area 0 summarization - yes or no..
> I've also noticed that the summary route to null0 is fed back to the ospf
> routing domain..
>
> O IA 139.4.34.0/24 [110/128] via 139.4.34.6, 00:18:24, Serial0.1
<---the
> summary
> C 139.4.34.0/29 is directly connected, Serial0.1 <----the actual
>
> is this gonna cause problems?
>
> si
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:09 GMT-3