From: Sundar Palaniappan (sundar_palaniappan@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Mar 14 2002 - 15:28:41 GMT-3
To add to that, in order for the distribute list to work you reference an
access-list in the distribute list command. Again, you are not using the
access-list to filter packets in this scenario rather filter routes.
--Sundar
>From: Sandro Ciffali <sandyccie@yahoo.com>
>Reply-To: Sandro Ciffali <sandyccie@yahoo.com>
>To: "Wright, Jeremy" <JA_WRIGHT@admworld.com>,
>"'ccielab@groupstudy.com'" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Re: redistribution
>Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 08:57:39 -0800 (PST)
>
>access-group us used to perform a packet level
>filtering, distribute-list is used to network in
>routing update filtering, These are two different
>things.
>
>Sandro
>--- "Wright, Jeremy" <JA_WRIGHT@admworld.com> wrote:
> > im studying up on redistribution and have a minor
> > question. Here is a sample
> > config from CCO:
> > R5:
> >
> > router igrp 7
> >
> > network 181.16.2.0
> >
> >
> >
> > redistribute rip metric 1 1 1 1 1
> >
> > distribute-list 1 in s1
> >
> >
> >
> > router rip
> >
> > network 178.1.10.0
> >
> > redistribute igrp 7 metric 2
> >
> >
> >
> > access-list 1 deny 192.168.1.0
> >
> > access-list 1 permit any
> >
> > I understand the concept behind blocking routes
> > coming in with mutual
> > redistribution and routing loops. Is there any
> > difference in
> > using distribute-list 1 in compared to access-group
> > 1 in on the same
> > interface?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ************************
> > Jeremy Wright
> >
> > Network Analyst
> > Archer Daniels Midland
> > ja_wright@admworld.com
> > (217)451-4063
> >
> > ************************
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:08 GMT-3