From: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi (mamoor@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Mar 14 2002 - 10:01:29 GMT-3
yes this is true and the full theory is that , these protocol does
converstion but they convert routers to -1
and -1 is not non-sense to them so they discard it.
-Mamoor
----- Original Message -----
From: Sundar Palaniappan <sundar_palaniappan@hotmail.com>
To: <potatomato@rogers.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 10:46 PM
Subject: Re: Redistribute connected Question
> "Redistribute connected" with the metric for the under EIGRP resolved the
> problem. I see a route on Router A and I can ping the ethernet of Router
B.
>
> Here is why, "redistribute connected" doesn't work without the metric. I
am
> quoting from page 715 of Doyle's book.
>
> The 0 metric is incompatible with the RIP,IGRP and EIGRP. These three
> protocols must have the appropriate metrics assigned to any redistributed
> routes, or redistribution will not work.
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Ling Ling Liang" <potatomato@rogers.com>
> >To: "Sundar Palaniappan" <sundar_palaniappan@hotmail.com>,
> ><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: Re: Redistribute connected Question
> >Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 22:49:09 -0500
> >
> >Hi, there,
> >
> > Can you try to assign metric to the redistributed routes?
> >
> > 'redistribute connected metric 1500 100 255 1 1500'
> >
> >Regards!
> >
> >LL
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Sundar Palaniappan" <sundar_palaniappan@hotmail.com>
> >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 9:54 PM
> >Subject: Redistribute connected Question
> >
> >
> > > There are two routers running EIGRP in a hub-and-spoke topology with a
> > > frame-relay connection between them.
> > >
> > >
> > > Here is the configuration:
> > >
> > > Router A:
> > >
> > > interface serial0.2
> > > ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.252
> > >
> > > router eigrp 200
> > > network 192.168.10.0
> > > no auto-summary
> > >
> > >
> > > Router B:
> > >
> > > interface e0
> > > ip address 172.16.0.1 255.255.0.0
> > >
> > > interface serial0.1
> > > ip address 192.168.10.2 255.255.255.252
> > >
> > > router eigrp 200
> > > network 192.168.10.0 (serial0.1)
> > > redistribute connected
> > > no auto-summary
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > EIGRP neighbor relationship is established. With this setup, I am
> >thinking
> >I
> > > should be able to ping the ethernet interface of Router B but I can't.
> > >
> > > I checked the route table on Router A and I don't see a route to
> >172.16.0.0
> > > subnet.
> > >
> > > When I removed "redistribute connected" and put the network statement
> > > (172.16.0.0) under the EIGRP process on Router B and it WORKS.
> > >
> > > Just curious to know why "redistribute connected" doesn't work.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Sundar
> > >
> > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:08 GMT-3