Re: the brain has left the building - OSPF area range - strange stuff

From: Sandro Ciffali (sandyccie@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Mar 12 2002 - 19:40:51 GMT-3

• Next message: Peter van Oene: "Re: BGP RR"
• Previous message: Peter van Oene: "RE: Route Reflection vs. Next Hop Self, Answered."
• Maybe in reply to: EdmondsSG@xxxxxxx: "the brain has left the building - OSPF area range - strange stuff"
• Next in thread: ying chang: "Re: the brain has left the building - OSPF area range - strange stuff"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Area range is a command required on all the ABRs, You
need to add the same command also for R4 since it is
ABR.

Sandro
--- EdmondsSG@aol.com wrote:
> guys and gals,
>
> I'm getting bogged down with the area range command
> in ospf:
>
> the scene..
> R5
> | igrp
> |
> R3 ------|area1 /29 mask
> |
> R4------R2
> area 0
>
> the link between r3 and r4 is a frame cloud.
> when i configure the area 1 range xxx.xxx.xxx.0
> 255.255.255 on R3 to get the
> /29 into R'5' routing table - it works. But on R4 I
> see the xxx.xxx.xxx.0/29
> as connected route (fine so far..), but also see the
> xxx.xxx.xxx.0/24 route
> as reachable via R3 !!
>
> split horizon is on the interfaces but i seem to be
> getting some sort of
> "feedback"
> ......or is this normal behaviour?
>
> any ideas before I go potty!!!
>
>
> thanks in advance
>
> si
>

• Next message: Peter van Oene: "Re: BGP RR"
• Previous message: Peter van Oene: "RE: Route Reflection vs. Next Hop Self, Answered."
• Maybe in reply to: EdmondsSG@xxxxxxx: "the brain has left the building - OSPF area range - strange stuff"
• Next in thread: ying chang: "Re: the brain has left the building - OSPF area range - strange stuff"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:02 GMT-3