Re: Variance with load balancing?

From: George Hansen (HansenG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Mar 11 2002 - 22:09:17 GMT-3

• Next message: WRHale@xxxxxxxxxx: "4/22/2002 date in SJ available"
• Previous message: George Hansen: "Re: For smart CCIE Candidates"
• Maybe in reply to: Shadi: "Variance with load balancing?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Your next hop is the same for both interfaces (10.1.1.2)? How did you manage th
at?

Fix that, and then try sh ip route 10.0.0.0. Look at the traffic share for each
 route to know how many packets will go out each interface.

HTH

George

>>> "Shadi" <ccie@investorsgrp.com> 03/10/02 12:10AM >>>
Hi all,

Does anyone tried the IGRP/EIGRP Variance for load balancing, it makes the
routing table appear as if it is load balancing but it is not!!

The packets are always send thru one path which is the thernet, so is variance
only for making the routing table appear as if it is load balancing, or there
is something wrong??

Sample Routing table

    Network next hop Metric Interface
D 10.0.0.0/24 10.1.1.2 (2560) Fastethenet0/0
D 10.0.0.0/24 10.1.1.2 (234012) serial0/0

• Next message: WRHale@xxxxxxxxxx: "4/22/2002 date in SJ available"
• Previous message: George Hansen: "Re: For smart CCIE Candidates"
• Maybe in reply to: Shadi: "Variance with load balancing?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:01 GMT-3