From: Jason Gardiner (gardiner@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Mar 11 2002 - 10:49:24 GMT-3
Level 2 routes are backbones routes in IS-IS. I suspect that it's assumed
that you're aggregating the Level 1 routes in Level 2 and redistribution is
streamlined that way. But it's just a guess.
On Saturday 09 March 2002 11:45, Michael C. Popovich wrote:
> Can someone explain to me why when IS-IS is redistributed into OSPF by
> default it only redistributes level-2 routes and not level-1-2 routes?
>
> I assume there is a good reason for redistribution purposes.
>
> Thanks,
>
> MP
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:00 GMT-3