From: Paul Borghese (pborghese@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Mar 11 2002 - 09:54:12 GMT-3
To change the source address you use NAT not a route map.
Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: "Prenesh Padayachee" <preneshp@is.co.za>
To: "'Shadi'" <ccie@investorsgrp.com>; "Paul Borghese"
<pborghese@groupstudy.com>
Cc: "ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 3:56 AM
Subject: RE: For smart CCIE Candidates
> Not sure exactly what you are trying to do here. But have you tried
creating
> a loopback on R1 using the 204.100.100.1 address range and then use
extended
> pings to use that as a source interface. However you will not get the
reply
> packets as R3 will see the destination as a locally connected interface.
You
> could however "debug ip icmp" on R3 and verify that the reply packets are
> being sent to the loopback on R1.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shadi [mailto:ccie@investorsgrp.com]
> Sent: 11 March 2002 09:42 AM
> To: Paul Borghese
> Cc: ccielab
> Subject: Re: For smart CCIE Candidates
>
> Hi Paul,
>
>
> How can I change the source address for any packet going out from an
> interface, there is no command in the route map to do that!!
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Shadi" <ccie@investorsgrp.com>
> To: "Paul Borghese" <pborghese@groupstudy.com>
> Cc: "ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 9:34 AM
> Subject: Re: For smart CCIE Candidates
>
>
> > How is that Paul?
> >
> > I tried to do it like policy routing but it didn't work, I want to make
> the
> > router inteliginet enough so it can send a ping with source address
> network
> > to be the same as the destination address network. May be I did
something
> > wrong, I will see it again, if you have any ideas why not to shoot them
> ;-)
> >
> > Shadi
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Paul Borghese" <pborghese@groupstudy.com>
> > To: "Shadi" <ccie@investorsgrp.com>; "ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 4:36 PM
> > Subject: Re: For smart CCIE Candidates
> >
> >
> > > Have you tried IP policy routing?
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Shadi" <ccie@investorsgrp.com>
> > > To: "ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 4:05 AM
> > > Subject: For smart CCIE Candidates
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > If you have two IP addresses on the same interface (one primary and
> the
> > > other
> > > > secondary), how can you make the router for each network it tries to
> > reach
> > > it
> > > > should use one of the ip addresses as the source ip for that
network?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > R1 wants to ping R2 it should use 10.1.1.1 (which is by default
> works)?
> > > >
> > > > R1 wants to ping R3 is should use 204.100.100.1 as the source IP
> address
> > > not
> > > > 10.1.1.1,
> > > >
> > > > I tried it with Nating but it didn't work with me!!!
> > > >
> > > > So anybody have any ideas?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
R1(10.1.1.1)----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > R
> > > > 2(10.1.1.1)
> > > > (204.100.100.1 Secondary)
> > > > |
> > > > |
> > > > |
> > > > |
> > > > |
> > > > R3
> > > > (204.100.100.2)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:00 GMT-3