From: Ling Ling Liang (potatomato@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Mar 10 2002 - 14:10:29 GMT-3
Hi, there,
You should use router-id, not interface address in the virtual link
command.
Regards!
Lingling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carl Phelan" <carlphelan@hotmail.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 11:15 AM
Subject: OSPF Virtual Links
> Hi All,
>
> I am having problems establishing virtual links in OSPF as follows:
>
> R2 has a loopback not configured in a routing protocol and has S0 in
> area 0 and e0 in area 1, R4 has its e0 in area 1 also and has neighbored
> with R2 in area 1. R2 has a loopback address in area 55. I need to
> create a virtual link over area 1 for area 55 as it is not physically
> connected to area 0. The router-ids for both R2 and R4 is of course the
> loopbacks but I cannot specify these in the virtual links as they cannot
> be seen by either router so I have created the virtual link as follows:
>
> R2
> .
> Area 1 virtual-link 135.14.220.2 (e0 on R4)
>
> R4
> ..
> Area 1 virtual-link 135.14.220.1 (e0 on R2)
>
> But this does not work. Must I include R2's loopback into OSPF as this
> is the router-id? I would rather not and would also try and avoid
> manually changing the router-id with that command.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Carl
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:58 GMT-3