From: Shadi (ccie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Mar 10 2002 - 12:58:39 GMT-3
I did no ip route-cache of course, but still coming out from the
fastethnernet.
When I played with Bandwidth and delay on the interface, without variance,
so I can make both interfaces have the same metric it worked fine.
So why variance is not working with load balancing?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Erick B." <erickbe@yahoo.com>
To: "Shadi" <ccie@investorsgrp.com>; "ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 10:36 AM
Subject: Re: Variance with load balancing?
> If you have fast-switching enabled (route-cache) it
> will do per-destination. With per-packet (no ip
> route-cache under interface) then it will use both
> links.
>
> If you're using CEF, then it's per destination by
> default unless you configure it for per-packet.
>
> --- Shadi <ccie@investorsgrp.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Does anyone tried the IGRP/EIGRP Variance for load
> > balancing, it makes the
> > routing table appear as if it is load balancing but
> > it is not!!
> >
> > The packets are always send thru one path which is
> > the thernet, so is variance
> > only for making the routing table appear as if it is
> > load balancing, or there
> > is something wrong??
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:58 GMT-3