From: Ouellette, Tim (tim.ouellette@xxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Mar 09 2002 - 12:51:33 GMT-3
Was there a doubt? Just kidding.
Come to think of it, I'm not sure if I was right that r3 would advertise
that network to r2? I'd have to test that. I am fairly sure about r2 having
to redistribute connection though. As Paul said, don't forget to add the
subnets keyword in OSPF otherwise it'll only allow in networks that are at
the classful bit boundry.
Cheers!
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Curtis Phillips [mailto:cphillips@blazenet.net]
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 10:29 AM
To: Ouellette, Tim; RSiddappa@NECBNS.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: My Bad..Re: OSPF and Conneted.
Tim, you are right.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ouellette, Tim" <tim.ouellette@eds.com>
To: "'Curtis Phillips'" <cphillips@blazenet.net>; <RSiddappa@NECBNS.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 9:59 AM
Subject: RE: OSPF and Conneted.
> Maybe i'm just not thinking correctly this morning. From r3's
perspective.
> Would it not send out an advertise on that link describing that link?
Such
> as, if r3 has the "network 10.0.0.0" statement in it and it's interface
> pointing at r2 is 10.1.1.1/24. Would it not advertise the network
10.0.0.0
> out that interface and therefor if r2 had igrp turned on for that
particular
> interface it'll take that update and redistribute it?
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Curtis Phillips [mailto:cphillips@blazenet.net]
> Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 9:31 AM
> To: RSiddappa@NECBNS.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: OSPF and Conneted.
>
>
> from the perspective of r2 the link between r2 and r3
> is a connected route. It will not be redistributed into
> OSPF from IGRP. So, yes you have to either a) place it in theOSPF domain
> with a network statement and passive-interface or b) redistribute it as a
> connected route into OSPF.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <RSiddappa@NECBNS.com>
> To: <RSiddappa@NECBNS.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 8:56 AM
> Subject: OSPF and Conneted.
>
>
> > r1--------------------------r2----------------------------------------r3
> >
> > R1 in area 0 and ( OSPF)
> >
> > r1 and r2 in area 1 (/28) (OSPF)
> >
> > r2 and r3 runngin IGRP (/24)
> >
> > I ahve created a loop back of /28 on the R2 and summarized in OSPF and
> > redistributed in to oSPF.
> >
> > All this is fine.
> >
> > I am not seeing the /24 IGRP route on r1.
> >
> > Do I need to do redistribute connected. If yes wwhat if they say
> redistibute
> > between OSFP and IGRP mutually.
> >
> > R.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:58 GMT-3