From: Curtis Phillips (cphillips@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Mar 09 2002 - 11:30:54 GMT-3
from the perspective of r2 the link between r2 and r3
is a connected route. It will not be redistributed into
OSPF from IGRP. So, yes you have to either a) place it in theOSPF domain
with a network statement and passive-interface or b) redistribute it as a
connected route into OSPF.
----- Original Message -----
From: <RSiddappa@NECBNS.com>
To: <RSiddappa@NECBNS.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 8:56 AM
Subject: OSPF and Conneted.
> r1--------------------------r2----------------------------------------r3
>
> R1 in area 0 and ( OSPF)
>
> r1 and r2 in area 1 (/28) (OSPF)
>
> r2 and r3 runngin IGRP (/24)
>
> I ahve created a loop back of /28 on the R2 and summarized in OSPF and
> redistributed in to oSPF.
>
> All this is fine.
>
> I am not seeing the /24 IGRP route on r1.
>
> Do I need to do redistribute connected. If yes wwhat if they say
redistibute
> between OSFP and IGRP mutually.
>
> R.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:58 GMT-3