From: MOLINA, MARTIN J *Internet* (PBI) (mm1343@xxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Mar 09 2002 - 03:04:25 GMT-3
I'm running 12.1(2). No biggie. I'll just continue failing both ends
manually. Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Manny Gonzalez [mailto:manny@nyp.org]
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 9:58 PM
To: MOLINA, MARTIN J *Internet* (PBI)
Cc: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: Re: Router as Frame Switch
What IOS on the frame switch router?
Some IOS versions will show ACTIVE as long as you you have local usage =
local. Some IOS's only see ACTIVE if the other side is got a configured
DLCI matching the local end...
I am at 12.1(x)y on all my gear and still have instances of ACTIVE /
INACTIVE regardless of local or remote DLCI/Protocol mapping activity.
Moral? Try different IOS on the gear...
Regards...
"MOLINA, MARTIN J *Internet* (PBI)" wrote:
>
> Small problem with my simulated Frame switch. I am using a 7505 with
Legacy
> Fast Serial Interface Processors as a Frame switch. My problem is the 7505
> is not propagating pvc failures to the other end of the mock Frame
circuit.
> For example, using point to point sub-interfaces, if I perform a "shut" on
> one end I fully expect to see the other end PVC status as "inactive". I
see
> it as active. Is anyone aware of any workarounds on the Frame Switch? I
> can't use End to End Keepalive on the spokes. As luck would have it, the 2
> spokes are not running IOS that supports FREEK. Thanks in advance.
>
> Martin Molina
> Senior Network Engineer
> Pacific Bell Internet Services
> CCNP CCDP
> desk: 925 973-7774
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:58 GMT-3