From: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi (mamoor@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Mar 08 2002 - 21:57:12 GMT-3
die thread die............................... please.............. !!!!!
-Mamoor
----- Original Message -----
From: Kurt Kruegel <kurt@cybernex.net>
To: Leonardo Pereira <lpereira@br.ibm.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 5:33 AM
Subject: Re: IPX EIGRP hold-time
> kind of like saying jaywalking's only a crime if you get caught.
> bottom line .... is
> the same thing i said before
> understand the nda and protect your own butt in regard to it.
> people here do a good job of policing themselves
>
> Leonardo Pereira wrote:
>
> > Hey Guys,
> >
> > Let me explain. I didn't want to blame anybody. I know that Chuck
replied
> > to him only and he replied to list. But if Chuck haven't said about the
NDA
> > to him and he haven't replied the Chuck's reply to the list, nobody will
> > know that probably there is a question like that in one of the exams.
> >
> > Let me tell one thing. I did the lab exam last month. Unfortunately I
> > didn't pass. Now I am preparing to my next attemp at San Jose on March,
> > 27th. A few days ago one person posted a question here exactly (word by
> > word) like one that was in my exam. A lot of people answer and nobody
> > talked about NDA. Now let's imagine if I had posted a message telling
> > "watch the NDA" to this guy. What would happened ???
> >
> > My point is:
> > If nobody knows that a question posted here is present in one of the
exams,
> > there is no NDA violation. Or will anybody here say that all the
questions
> > posted here are different from the ones found at lab exam ?
> >
> > Just to finish, I would like to say that I AGREE with and respect the
NDA.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Leonardo.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:57 GMT-3