From: John Mistichelli (jmistichelli@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Mar 05 2002 - 09:47:27 GMT-3
Just a thought...
Maybe you can use PPP link quality to monitor your drops and bring down the
interface when there are too many. For example:
interface ATM2/0.1 point-to-point
atm pvc 1 0 50 aal5ciscoppp Virtual-Template1
!
interface Virtual-Template1
ip address 10.0.0.1 255.0.0.0
ppp quality 50
!
I set link quality to 50%. AKA when 50% of the packets get dropped the
interface goes down. Then, do a track on the Virtual-Template1 interface.
For example:
interface Ethernet0/0
ip address 172.16.1.2 255.255.255.0
half-duplex
standby 1 ip 172.16.1.1
standby 1 preempt
standby 1 track Vt1 90
Maybe this will work??? Any thoughts out there?
John
7536
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
John Mistichelli
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 6:53 AM
To: Jeffrey Levine; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: "fuzzy" HSRP failover
What do you mean by degraded performance?
John
7536
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Jeffrey Levine
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:43 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: OT: "fuzzy" HSRP failover
This is off-topic, but I am interested in feedback.
Here's the situation: I have two DS3 lines between two sites with routers
at each end configured using HSRP. This works fine. When the main DS3 goes
down, failover works. Here's the question: How can I cause a failover if
there is degraded performance on the primary line, but not a complete
failure?
thank!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:53 GMT-3