Re: policy routing and ip nexy-hop

From: Charles Manafa (charles.manafa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Mar 02 2002 - 13:25:58 GMT-3


   
Policy routing does not use the contents of the routing table to forward
packets, so the inclusion of a routing table element in the route map
statement wouldn't make sense. If policy routing fails, then the packet is
forwarded as normal, using the routing table.

CM

----- Original Message -----
From: "Przemyslaw Karwasiecki" <karwas@ifxcorp.com>
To: "alain faure" <alainfaure@yahoo.fr>
Cc: "garry baker" <fallow46@yahoo.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2002 1:34 PM
Subject: Re: policy routing and ip nexy-hop

> I had the same problem couple weeks ago.
> Try looking in archives of the group.
> ---
> Bottom line:
>
> As Alain said -- you cannot use "match ip next-hop"
> in route-map objects used for policy routing.
>
> Przemek
>
> On Sat, 2002-03-02 at 07:19, alain faure wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > What i found in cisco CD is that you can use :
> > > match ip next hop 1
> > for route-map for redistribution, but apparantly not for policy routing,
so if
> > it is right there is a lot of chance (?) that all your pakets match. And
by the
> > way produce some not very good thinght in term of IGRP behavior (like
announce
> > packet going the wrong way)
> > What do you think about that ?
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > --- garry baker <fallow46@yahoo.com> a icrit : > Guys,
> > >
> > > I have run into a problem with policy routing and ip
> > > next hop. i have a frame network that is not fully
> > > meshed and i am only allowed one fame map statement.
> > > so to get full connectivity I need to polciy route so
> > > that anything destined for the router that i don'thave
> > > a pvc for should go via another pvc.
> > >
> > > what i have done is set a some policy routing that
> > > says:
> > >
> > > route-map next-hop permit 10
> > > match ip next hop 1
> > > set ip next-hop 64.108.4.4
> > >
> > > access-list 1 permit 64.108.4.3
> > >
> > > i activate this route map on the appropriate
> > > interfaces and also local policy routing. my problem
> > > is that everything is matching this policy route even
> > > networks that i am trying to get to that are directly
> > > connected are taking the long route thanks to the
> > > route map. I know i must be doing something silly
> > > here. i have a router talking igrp to this router that
> > > loses all it igrp routes from this policy routed box
> > > when the internal policy routing is turned on. Can
> > > someone help me with this???
> > >
> > >
> > > Garry
> > >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:51 GMT-3