From: Przemyslaw Karwasiecki (karwas@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Mar 02 2002 - 10:34:09 GMT-3
I had the same problem couple weeks ago.
Try looking in archives of the group.
--- Bottom line:As Alain said -- you cannot use "match ip next-hop" in route-map objects used for policy routing.
Przemek
On Sat, 2002-03-02 at 07:19, alain faure wrote: > Hi, > > What i found in cisco CD is that you can use : > > match ip next hop 1 > for route-map for redistribution, but apparantly not for policy routing, so i f > it is right there is a lot of chance (?) that all your pakets match. And by t he > way produce some not very good thinght in term of IGRP behavior (like announc e > packet going the wrong way) > What do you think about that ? > > Best regards > > --- garry baker <fallow46@yahoo.com> a icrit : > Guys, > > > > I have run into a problem with policy routing and ip > > next hop. i have a frame network that is not fully > > meshed and i am only allowed one fame map statement. > > so to get full connectivity I need to polciy route so > > that anything destined for the router that i don'thave > > a pvc for should go via another pvc. > > > > what i have done is set a some policy routing that > > says: > > > > route-map next-hop permit 10 > > match ip next hop 1 > > set ip next-hop 64.108.4.4 > > > > access-list 1 permit 64.108.4.3 > > > > i activate this route map on the appropriate > > interfaces and also local policy routing. my problem > > is that everything is matching this policy route even > > networks that i am trying to get to that are directly > > connected are taking the long route thanks to the > > route map. I know i must be doing something silly > > here. i have a router talking igrp to this router that > > loses all it igrp routes from this policy routed box > > when the internal policy routing is turned on. Can > > someone help me with this??? > > > > > > Garry > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:51 GMT-3