From: alain faure (alainfaure@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Mar 02 2002 - 09:19:34 GMT-3
Hi,
What i found in cisco CD is that you can use :
> match ip next hop 1
for route-map for redistribution, but apparantly not for policy routing, so if
it is right there is a lot of chance (?) that all your pakets match. And by the
way produce some not very good thinght in term of IGRP behavior (like announce
packet going the wrong way)
What do you think about that ?
Best regards
--- garry baker <fallow46@yahoo.com> a icrit : > Guys,
>
> I have run into a problem with policy routing and ip
> next hop. i have a frame network that is not fully
> meshed and i am only allowed one fame map statement.
> so to get full connectivity I need to polciy route so
> that anything destined for the router that i don'thave
> a pvc for should go via another pvc.
>
> what i have done is set a some policy routing that
> says:
>
> route-map next-hop permit 10
> match ip next hop 1
> set ip next-hop 64.108.4.4
>
> access-list 1 permit 64.108.4.3
>
> i activate this route map on the appropriate
> interfaces and also local policy routing. my problem
> is that everything is matching this policy route even
> networks that i am trying to get to that are directly
> connected are taking the long route thanks to the
> route map. I know i must be doing something silly
> here. i have a router talking igrp to this router that
> loses all it igrp routes from this policy routed box
> when the internal policy routing is turned on. Can
> someone help me with this???
>
>
> Garry
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:51 GMT-3