From: Leigh Anne Chisholm (lachisho@xxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Mar 01 2002 - 15:33:32 GMT-3
That's a drastic response to what is actually a simple problem. In
implementing that solution, you're creating the potential for problems well
beyond those that you want to resolve. Spanning Tree has a simple priority
system that's easy to manipulate that doesn't have the implications of your
solution.
Check the CCNA curriculum for information on how to configure a switch so that
it can't become the root switch in any given VLAN.
-- Leigh Anne
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
alain faure
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 11:23 AM
To: Clark J; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: a question on SPANTREE
hi,
that's interresting question, and we have a long debate on this with some of
my
friends about one of our customer site.
for me, i think the better way (but they don't agree with me) is to disable
spanning tree on the VLAN for the switch you don't want they become root ?
What
do you think about ?
best regards
--- Clark J <clark.j@163.com> a icrit : > Dear CCIEs and Near CCIEs,
> How to configure a switch so that it can't become the root switch in VLAN
A
> ?
> Best regards,
> Clarke J
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:50 GMT-3