From: kym blair (kymblair@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Feb 23 2002 - 19:38:16 GMT-3
Bob,
Your network statements under the ospf process (or eigrp, etc.) identify
which directly connected interfaces will participate in ospf. Those, and
all other routes known by ospf, will be redistributed.
If you do not wish some interfaces to participate, do not add a network
statement for them. If your network statement cannot avoid including some
unwanted connected interfaces, then add passive-interface commands so your
advertisements don't go out those interfaces (especially important on BRI),
and use a distribute-list to eliminate these routes from redistribution.
HTH, Kym
>From: "Bob Sinclair" <bsin@erols.com>
>Reply-To: "Bob Sinclair" <bsin@erols.com>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: OSPF > EIGRP includes Connected?
>Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 14:55:20 -0500
>
>Folk:
>
>I am laboring under the impression that when I redistribute one protocol
>into another, say OSPF into EIGRP, that what gets into EIGRP will be routes
>in the routing table that are OSPF routes (O, IA, E1, E2). Yet, My EIGRP
>router is also getting all connected routes that are running OSPF on the
>redistributing router as well, regardless of class or major network. They
>are, of course, showing up as connected in the routing table of the
>redistributing router.
>
>Same result if redistribute IGRP2 into EIGRP1: Eigrp is getting connected
>routes on the redistributing router that are running IGRP 2.
>
>Is my basic assumption wrong, that routes are distributed as they are
>labeled in the table? Or am I seeing something peculiar? I am running
>12.1(11).
>
>Thanks
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:32 GMT-3