From: Wu, Sean (sean.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Feb 22 2002 - 01:06:10 GMT-3
I haven't tested your route-map in lab yet. But where did you apply the
route-map? Even if it is applied as a policy based routing, what about
local-policy? shall we enable that?
thanks.
Sean Wu
-----Original Message-----
From: Todd Carswell [mailto:acarswell@nc.rr.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 5:40 PM
To: RSiddappa@NECBNS.com; neiby@ureach.com; jim.phillipo@guardent.com;
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Frame map vs intfc DLCI
Very true! I did not elaborate on my point the way I should have. You MUST
have at least 1 frame-relay map statement OR an interface-dlci statement on
the frame-relay connected interface.
IF you're in a lab scenario where you are instructed to use only 1 frame-map
statement per interface, though, you can provide connectivity throughout
your network using a route map. Here's an example...
You only have 1 frame-relay map statement. It provides connectivity with a
hub. To reach other networks connected to the hub, you can use a route
map...
access-list 101 permit ip any 100.10.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 101 permit ip any host 121.20.1.1
route-map 10 permit 10
match ip address 101
set ip next-hop 192.100.2.1
The network 100.10.0.0 and the host 121.20.1.1 can be "seen" by the hub.
**************************************************************************
The information transmitted herewith is sensitive information intended only
for use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or other
use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:30 GMT-3