From: Todd Carswell (acarswell@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Feb 21 2002 - 19:43:21 GMT-3
Let me revise my statement...
You actually do NOT need the frame-map statement or the interface-dlci
command. Inverse ARP will learn the dlci's.
The stuff I said about the route-maps still stands. :-)
Sorry.
Todd Carswell
----- Original Message -----
From: "Todd Carswell" <acarswell@nc.rr.com>
To: <RSiddappa@NECBNS.com>; <neiby@ureach.com>; <jim.phillipo@guardent.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 5:40 PM
Subject: Re: Frame map vs intfc DLCI
> Very true! I did not elaborate on my point the way I should have. You
MUST
> have at least 1 frame-relay map statement OR an interface-dlci statement
on
> the frame-relay connected interface.
>
> IF you're in a lab scenario where you are instructed to use only 1
frame-map
> statement per interface, though, you can provide connectivity throughout
> your network using a route map. Here's an example...
>
> You only have 1 frame-relay map statement. It provides connectivity with
a
> hub. To reach other networks connected to the hub, you can use a route
> map...
>
> access-list 101 permit ip any 100.10.0.0 0.0.255.255
> access-list 101 permit ip any host 121.20.1.1
> route-map 10 permit 10
> match ip address 101
> set ip next-hop 192.100.2.1
>
> The network 100.10.0.0 and the host 121.20.1.1 can be "seen" by the hub.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <RSiddappa@NECBNS.com>
> To: <acarswell@nc.rr.com>; <neiby@ureach.com>;
<jim.phillipo@guardent.com>;
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 5:26 PM
> Subject: RE: Frame map vs intfc DLCI
>
>
> >
> > But how is the DLCi asssocited with partular sub-interafce which is
> > Multi-point.
> >
> > Use the Intf-dlci command under multi-point subinterafce.
> >
> > R.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Todd Carswell [mailto:acarswell@nc.rr.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 4:21 PM
> > To: Siddappa, Rajeev; neiby@ureach.com; jim.phillipo@guardent.com;
> > ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: Frame map vs intfc DLCI
> >
> >
> > If you are forbidden from using the frame-relay map statement, you can
> > overcome the problem in layer 3 by using route maps to set the ip
next-hop
> > address.
> >
> > Todd Carswell
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <RSiddappa@NECBNS.com>
> > To: <neiby@ureach.com>; <jim.phillipo@guardent.com>;
> > <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 4:37 PM
> > Subject: RE: Frame map vs intfc DLCI
> >
> >
> > > What do u do when they ask in the lab, do not use fram-relay map
> > statement.
> > > How ill u configure a DLCi for Multipoint interface. ( Do not need to
> > worry
> > > about physical, since DLCI will be assigned directly to the physical
> > > interface)
> > >
> > > My 2 cents..
> > >
> > > R.
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: John Neiberger [mailto:neiby@ureach.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 11:59 AM
> > > To: jim.phillipo@guardent.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: Re: Frame map vs intfc DLCI
> > >
> > >
> > > It's very interesting that you mention this today. I'd never,
> > > ever, seen anyone use the frame-relay interface-dlci command on
> > > multipoint interfaces until last night when another list member
> > > who shall remain nameless (Tim Ouellette) called me about this
> > > exact issue.
> > >
> > > We had a hub router configured with a multipoint subinterface
> > > using two frame-relay interface-dlci commands instead of frame
> > > maps. At first I thought this wouldn't work at all but it did,
> > > somewhat. The command reference says appears to say that it
> > > ought to work in conjunction with inverse ARP.
> > >
> > > However, it didn't seem to be stable and behaved erratically.
> > > When we removed those two statements and replaced them with two
> > > frame maps things settled down quite nicely.
> > >
> > > Specifically, we were having issues with EIGRP. It seemed to
> > > work, but the output of show ip eigrp neighbors indicated that
> > > things might not be working as they ought to be. Sorry, I
> > > don't have that info available here at work but if Tim reads
> > > this might be able to post the exact results.
> > >
> > > I've always been under the impression that we only used the
> > > frame-relay interface-dlci command on point-to-point
> > > subinterfaces so I've always used frame maps in all other cases.
> > >
> > > What do you all think about this issue? Is there a time to use
> > > one or the other on multipoint interfaces? Any gotchas we need
> > > to look out for?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > John
> > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:30 GMT-3