From: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi (mamoor@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Feb 21 2002 - 13:51:17 GMT-3
Very Good points....... this is a command problem that when implementing ,
people assume that is should
also be done.... please please dont assume or u will be asumed as fails....
as the proctor as he is there
to tell u such questions.
Once me and my friend was implementing a lab scenerio on ospf and bgp .....
when he implements he did not feel to implement route-reflector and his
scenerio works
when i implement i cant do it with out route-reflector.
The lab was such that i mandetory need route-reflector....
mine and his both work out and pinging everywhere, the only thing is that he
assumed many things that was
not part of that lab. so what u will say for that thing.
If this would be a real exam then he will definetly fail and i pass .....
then we will be talking that both of
our scenerio works then why me fail, because he didnt do what was told, he
did what was not part of the lab.
I will make sure in the real lab that i will do the minimum amount of things
and that which is told and will
NOT ASSUME ..... if there is written that u can then i will definitely poke
the proctor. and will do P-P everytime
i find some thing like this.....
-Mamoor
----- Original Message -----
From: Charles Huang <CharlesNY2000@Yahoo.Com>
To: DAN DORTON <DHSTS68@dhs.state.il.us>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>;
<daniel@prove-it.co.uk>
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: Exam re-score question
> There are many ways to implement a requirement. The CCIE labs won't be so
> hard if you can implement them as long as it works. You need to
> "understand" every requirements in the question in order to score the
> points. For example, if a question ask to make R1, R2 & R3 run OSPF with
> simple security. It is actually asking you to implement clear text
> authentication on OSPF, so make sure you dont use MD5 for authentication.
> If a question ask to run OSPF on R5, I would ask the proctor "what
process
> ID should I use". In another words, I would ask the proctor if the
> questions are not specific. Any requirement with 2 or more possible
> implementations, I would ask the proctor "should I implement this
> requirement using method A,B or C." The proctor either tell me to use one
> of the methods, or he will tell me to re-read the question, which means i
> misread or misunderstood the question.
>
>
> just my 2 cents
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "DAN DORTON" <DHSTS68@dhs.state.il.us>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>; <daniel@prove-it.co.uk>
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 9:01 AM
> Subject: Re: Exam re-score question
>
>
> > You are absolutely right...
> >
> > You ARE NOT supposed to discuss this.
> >
> > Read the E-Mail again carefully.
> >
> > >>> "Daniel Prinsloo" <daniel@prove-it.co.uk> 02/20/02 09:14AM >>>
> > Good day,
> >
> > I know I am probably not allowed to discuss this, but I have a question
> > regarding my Lab which I did recently. My scores were quite good, most
of
> > the subjects I was 80% plus up to 100% in some, but on IP/IOS features
my
> > score was 38%. I first thought there was something wrong with the
> e-proctor,
> > in that I achieved the goals (everything was working as required), but
> maybe
> > not with the exact wording that is required. So, I asked for a re-score.
I
> > just got the reply back that stating that the re-score had the same
> results.
> > This concerns me, as all my features, from Voice/DLSW/Routing, etc
worked
> > correctly, but how could IP not work?
> > How it this then judged? Must we use only the commands that the
e-proctor
> > requires in the format and exact wording before we achieve the correct
> > marks. Or am just not thinking the "Cisco way".
> >
> > Thanks for you response in advance.
> >
> >
> > Daniel
> > CCSI, CCNA, CCNP, CCDA, CCDP, CCS1
> > Security Spec, Voice Spec, CCIP, HPOV cert
> > Checkpoint CCSE, Tivoli Cert, CCNA WAN
> > CCNP WAN, Network Mgmt Spec, SNA Spec
> >
> > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name
> of Blank Bkgrd.gif]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:29 GMT-3