From: Church, Chuck (cchurch@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Feb 21 2002 - 09:16:27 GMT-3
When I was at RTP last week, we asked about the E-Proctor. All labs there
are being graded by human proctors. I don't think they've gotten the bugs
out of E-Proctor yet for the 1-day lab.
Chuck Church
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
US Tennis Association
70 W. Red Oak Lane
White Plains, NY 10604
914-696-7199
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
saeed.tasbihsazan@didata.com.au
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 12:47 AM
To: Brian McGahan
Cc: Ccielab@Groupstudy.Com; Daniel Prinsloo; nobody@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: E-Proctor??? (Was Re: Exam re-score question)
Daniel,
While I'm sure we are all very impressed with your list of
certifications... I must add that I have got the same problem as you do.
Regards,
Saeed
GoGGO, MFGP, DFD, DFE, ETC.....
"Brian
McGahan" To: "Daniel Prinsloo"
<daniel@prove-it.co.uk>,
<brian@cyscoe "Ccielab@Groupstudy.Com"
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
xpert.com> cc:
Sent by: Subject: E-Proctor??? (Was Re:
Exam re-score question)
nobody@groups
tudy.com
21/02/2002
03:40 PM
Please
respond to
"Brian
McGahan"
E-Proctor??? This is the first I'm hearing of this... Anyone care to help
me out?
Thanks,
Brian McGahan
CCIE #8593
brian@cyscoexpert.com
CyscoExpert Corporation
Internetwork Consulting & Training
http://www.cyscoexpert.com
Voice: 847.674.3392
Fax: 847.674.2625
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Prinsloo" <daniel@prove-it.co.uk>
To: "Ccielab@Groupstudy.Com" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 9:14 AM
Subject: Exam re-score question
> Good day,
>
> I know I am probably not allowed to discuss this, but I have a question
> regarding my Lab which I did recently. My scores were quite good, most of
> the subjects I was 80% plus up to 100% in some, but on IP/IOS features my
> score was 38%. I first thought there was something wrong with the
e-proctor,
> in that I achieved the goals (everything was working as required), but
maybe
> not with the exact wording that is required. So, I asked for a re-score.
I
> just got the reply back that stating that the re-score had the same
results.
> This concerns me, as all my features, from Voice/DLSW/Routing, etc worked
> correctly, but how could IP not work?
> How it this then judged? Must we use only the commands that the e-proctor
> requires in the format and exact wording before we achieve the correct
> marks. Or am just not thinking the "Cisco way".
>
> Thanks for you response in advance.
>
>
> Daniel
> CCSI, CCNA, CCNP, CCDA, CCDP, CCS1
> Security Spec, Voice Spec, CCIP, HPOV cert
> Checkpoint CCSE, Tivoli Cert, CCNA WAN
> CCNP WAN, Network Mgmt Spec, SNA Spec
>
> [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name
of Blank Bkgrd.gif]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:29 GMT-3