From: Frank Jimenez (franjime@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Feb 18 2002 - 14:49:30 GMT-3
All,
Also note that although it's still fair game on the CCIElab AFAIK, NLSP
is quickly becoming relegated to the 'second tier' of supported
protocols, see http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/770/fn17582.shtml for
more details....
Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738
franjime@cisco.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Howard C. Berkowitz
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 11:04 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: NLSP Vs OSPF, RIP, IGRP...
>Hi all,
>Is there any way to redistribuye a NLSP network in IP routing protocols
>such as OSPF ir IGRP ? Does NLSP work only with RIP and EIGRP ? I mean,
>is there any caveat, trick or anything like that ? Thanks !
Simple answer: NLSP and IPX RIP only interface to NLSP.
Slightly more complex: if you need to carry such traffic through
an OSPF, etc., network, use GRE tunnels. That easily could be on the
lab exam.
In fact, you might be faced with using other kinds of tunnel to
carry IPX, such as L2TP or IPSec.
Beyond CCIE scope: The Opaque LSA was developed with, among other
things, using OSPF to distribute Novell information. As Novell moved
more to native IP, no one implmented this and no one is likely to do
so.
Opaque LSAs are extremely useful, however, in things like
communicating between the IP and sub-IP intelligent networks, traffic
engineering, etc.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:26 GMT-3