From: Mannan Venkatesan (mv_lab@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Feb 18 2002 - 12:34:15 GMT-3
Ok, if you move the mobile host to e0/0, don't you have to change the
default gateway on the host to 10.10.40.3??? And then, routing for your
mobile host is done by LAM. If you do that, why do you need bridging? What
if you move the host to different router? You can also use IRDP.
HTHs,
Mannan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sandro Ciffali" <sandyccie@yahoo.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 10:50 PM
Subject: Local Area Mobility
> Group,
> Here is what i am trying to do.
>
> R3 has two ethernet ports, E0/0 and E0/1. E0/0 has ip
> address 10.10.40.3/24, E0/1 has ip address
> 10.10.70.2/24. I have a mobile host on this network
> which i want to keep mobile from E0/0 to E0/1, The
> mobile host has a ip 10.10.70.1/24.
> I configred mobile arp timers for the two ethernet
> ports fine. Did a redistribute mobile under my Eigrp
> routing protocol,
> This sims to be working fine. I have following
> question.
> If this host moves to E0/0, Now he is on 10.10.40.0/24
> network, So how can the reply from 10.10.70.1/24 host
> be replied?
> To salve this issue i configured transparent bridging
> between two ethernet ports and it worked fine. Is this
> right way of doing it??? If yes then let us say we
> have a mobile host that is not in either of above two
> networks how will the reply from this host be routed
> back to the originator?
>
> Can some one pls. reply to the above question?
>
> Thanks
> Sandro
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:26 GMT-3