From: lee.dongsik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon Feb 18 2002 - 09:55:24 GMT-3
Nope, it didn't work either but thanks for the suggestion. Yours is
something I haven't tried, though. I was thinking more in line with a
way that enables me to match origin codes ( either i or ? ) with my
route-map. So far, it looks like regular-expressions only match numeric
AS-path info, not the origin codes.
Incidentally, I now suspect if it's even possible to accomplish what I
want by using a regular expression. I'll keep digging and let you know
if I find something pertinent. Again, I appreciate your prompt response.
Does anybody else have a comment on this. Thanks.
Lee...
-----Original Message-----
From: roybustos [mailto:roybustos@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 4:07 AM
To: lee.dongsik
Cc: roybustos; ccielab
Subject: Re: Regular Expression: redistributed vs. network(ed)
try
sho ip bgp reg [0-9]
this wont work with confeds tho
Roy
----- Original Message -----
From: <lee.dongsik@mail.sprint.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 1:07 AM
Subject: Regular Expression: redistributed vs. network(ed)
> Hi, all.
>
> What would be a correct regular-expression syntax to filter the
> redistributed routes by a ebgp peer instead of the routes added by
> "network" statement by the same peer?
>
> Played with various reg-exp syntaxes for quite some time but to no
> avail. I had researched various books and CCO site but no luck yet.
Can
> anybody shed light on this? Thanks.
>
> Lee...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:26 GMT-3