From: Lab Candidate (labccie@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Feb 17 2002 - 07:39:08 GMT-3
Don't you think we can use this technique to by-pass the "no static route" rule
in the lab?
--- Carolyn Camarda <ccamarda@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> While my routers reboot, I'll take a stab at this....
>
> You could do but remember the router will policy-route before it looks in
> the routing table. You would have to use an extended access-list with the
> destination of all your good 'routes' to deny them and then a permit any any
> statement for the rest.
>
> Sound right?
>
> IMO it wouldn't be pretty.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Don Banyong" <don_study@hotmail.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 7:49 PM
> Subject: Route-Maps
>
>
> > Hi y'all.
> > Is it possible to use policy routing (using route-maps) to completely
> > substitute static routes in an environment where there are no dynamic
> routes?
> >
> > I am trying to create a policy route that will send all internally
> generated
> > packets with unknown destination to a next-hop address. This should be the
> > same like using ip default-network or the ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 cmd.
> >
> > Any ideas? This is not part of any lab..... just brain storming!
> > Thanks,
> > Don
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:25 GMT-3