Re: FRTS

From: Richard Wheat (rwheat@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Feb 15 2002 - 12:21:54 GMT-3

• Next message: Brett Lewis: "RE: Trouble on ISDN"
• Previous message: Williams, Glenn: "RE: distribute lists in IS-IS........"
• Maybe in reply to: Kang BS: "FRTS"
• Next in thread: Carolyn Camarda: "Re: FRTS"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Good day,

I think your BE should be 2000 not 16000. BC + BE = maximum line rate.
Your BE value means the maximum line rate is 176kbps.
Otherwise it looks ok.

HTH,
Richard.

Kang BS wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have already read lot of stuff about FRTS including all of mail in the
> archives
> and cisco documents
> (http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/125/21.shtml
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/125/traffic_shaping_6151.html)
>
> But I am still confusing.
>
> On below question, Which is a correct configuration?
>
> - at 48Kbps, discard eligible
> at 64kbps, frame discard
> when recieving BECN, 16kbps should be guaranteed.
> basic time interval 125ms
>
> - My solution is
> frame-relay cir 48000
> frame-relay bc 6000
> frame-relay be 16000
> frame-relay mincir 16000
>
> is mine right or else?
>
> please help me.
>
> thanks in advance.
>
> BS Kang.
>

• Next message: Brett Lewis: "RE: Trouble on ISDN"
• Previous message: Williams, Glenn: "RE: distribute lists in IS-IS........"
• Maybe in reply to: Kang BS: "FRTS"
• Next in thread: Carolyn Camarda: "Re: FRTS"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:24 GMT-3