From: Bauer, Rick (BAUERR@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Feb 15 2002 - 10:07:37 GMT-3
Well it kind of matters what, where, and when. VOFR dial peers assume p2p
connections unless support for switched calls are added to the dial peers.
IMHO, VOFR dial peer's strong point is when you have an extra PVC for voice
traffic.
This is from 12.1
. The Cisco 2600 series and 3600 series routers also support VoIP. It is not
possible in this release to translate from the VoIP transport protocol to
other protocols such as VoFR. As a result, a call coming in on a VoIP
connection may not be (tandem) switched to a VoFR connection.
Watch the wrap.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/mult
i_c/mcprt1/mcdvofr.htm
-----Original Message-----
From: Giveortake@aol.com [mailto:Giveortake@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 12:22 AM
To: bsin@erols.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: VOIP vs. VOFR
You can do VOIP over frame. Or you can do VOFR over frame. Or for that
matter you can do VOFR over PTP. I have had better luck with VOFR as it
is layer 2 with less over head.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:23 GMT-3