Re: Doyle's Redist Question

From: Erich Borchert (erichb80@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Feb 13 2002 - 13:22:28 GMT-3


   
You seem to be right, it appears there's a error in his config.

Is the 10.201.100.0 a Eigrp Internal or External learned route ? If you
know that you won't need to have acl match on both permit staments just
whatever type of route it falls under internal/external.

HTH
-Erich
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lab Candidate" <labccie@yahoo.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 11:30 PM
Subject: Doyle's Redist Question

> On Doyle's Volume 1, page 840, Question 4 is asking:
> redistribute eigrp 1 into ospf 1, need to config:
> 1. internal eigrp routes as ospf E1 and metric 10
> 2. external eigrp routes as ospf E2 and metric 50
> 3. all routes should be redis'd except 10.201.100.0/24
>
> so I came up with a route-map to accomplish the task as:
>
> router ospf 1
> network 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 16
> redist eigrp 1 route-map exercise4
>
> access-list 1 deny 10.201.100.0
> access-list 1 permit any
>
> route-map exercise4 permit 10
> match ip address 1
> match route-type internal
> set metric 10
> set metric-type type-1
>
> route-map exercise4 permit 20
> match ip address 1
> match route-type external
> set metric 50
> set metric-type type-2
>
> route-map exercise4 permit 30
> match ip address 1
>
> Anyone agree or disagree with me so far?
>
> but Doyle's solution is as follows which I disagree:
>
> router ospf 1
> network 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 16
> redist eigrp 1 route-map exercise4
>
> access-list 1 deny 10.201.100.0
> access-list 1 permit any
>
> route-map exercise4 permit 10
> match ip address 1 <== this first permit clause will let all routes
through except list 1
> <== and the following 2 route-map clauses will not
be effective!!
> route-map exercise4 permit 20
> match route-type internal
> set metric 10
> set metric-type type-1
>
> route-map exercise4 permit 30
> match route-type external
> set metric 50
> set metric-type type-2
>
> I would like to hear your opinions on this.
>
> ----
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:21 GMT-3