Re: Cat 4K instead of Cat 5K

From: Duy Nguyen (net_port@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Feb 13 2002 - 10:35:09 GMT-3

Next message: Shadi: "Re: aggregate-address in bgp???"
Previous message: Duy Nguyen: "Re: Cisco mc3810"
Maybe in reply to: David: "Cat 4K instead of Cat 5K"
Next in thread: Asbjorn Hojmark: "RE: Cat 4K instead of Cat 5K"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Correcto!

>From: David <david_knot@yahoo.com>
>Reply-To: David <david_knot@yahoo.com>
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Cat 4K instead of Cat 5K
>Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 05:09:48 -0800 (PST)
>
>Can one practice on Cat4K for the lab instead of
>Cat5K? i.e. is the command line the same?
>
>

Next message: Shadi: "Re: aggregate-address in bgp???"
Previous message: Duy Nguyen: "Re: Cisco mc3810"
Maybe in reply to: David: "Cat 4K instead of Cat 5K"
Next in thread: Asbjorn Hojmark: "RE: Cat 4K instead of Cat 5K"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:20 GMT-3