From: michael robertson (michael_w_2ca@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Feb 08 2002 - 02:59:35 GMT-3
Hi, Group,
I meet some problem on the question on page Jeff's
book 840 (question 4 and 5 ). It seems to me that the
solution is a little bit confusing to me>
Can somebody explain to me what's the difference
between the following two route-map.
--------------------------------------
route-map 1:
access-list 1 deny 10.201.100.0
access-list 1 permit any
route-map exercise5 permit 10
match ip addres 1
route-map exercise5 permit 20
match route-type internal
set metric 10000 100 255 1 1500
route-map exercise5 permit 30
match route-type external
set metric 10000 100 255 1 1500
-------------------------------------------
The following is route-map 2
*********************************
route-map 2:
access-list 1 deny 10.201.100.0
access-list 1 permit any
route-map exercise5 permit 20
match ip addres 1
match route-type internal
set metric 10000 100 255 1 1500
route-map exercise5 permit 30
match ip addres 1
match route-type external
set metric 10000 100 255 1 1500
************************************
Question: As the question asked to configure the
router to redistribute internal EIGRP routes into OSPF
as E1 routes with a metric 10 and to redistribute
external EIGRP routes into OSPF as E2 routes with a
metric, ALl should be redistributed except
10.201.100.0/24.
THe route-map 1 is the soluton which I think might be
wrong, As route-map will process route-map
sequencially, whenever it find the first match:
route-map exercise5 permit 10
match ip addres 1
Then the route map will not go further ( in my
understanding) to statement 20 and 30. SO The first
route-map only deny the redistribution of
10.201.100.0/24. IT actually doesn't process 20 and
30, so it doesn't meet the requirement.
Am I wrong? or DO i miss something?
As always, your help will be greatly appreciated
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:15 GMT-3