From: Alan (groupstudy@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Feb 08 2002 - 00:31:01 GMT-3
A1: if you want to policy route packets, you should enable route-map in an int
erface.
while if you want to manipulate the routing information, you use it in
a routing process.
A2: the same question as A1. Route-map has two places to take effects.
when route-map is used in policy routing, you can use standard or extended ACL
to match both source and destination address.
when route-map is used with redistribution, "match ip add " matches routes th
at have a dest add specified by ACL. Only match one add (dest add), so we use s
tandard acl.
Check Jeff Doyle, it helps a lot.
----- Original Message -----
From: "michael robertson" <michael_w_2ca@yahoo.ca>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:41 AM
Subject: route map question
> Hi, Group,
>
> I have some question concerning route map.
>
> Question 1:
>
> when should i enable a route-map in an interface and
> when sould i use it in a routing process.
>
>
> Question 2.
>
>
> If I say
>
> route-map ccie permit 10
>
> match ip add 1
>
>
> this 1 is access-list 1
>
>
>
> then I will call access-list 1, but access-list will
> use source ip address( i.e. standard access-list). My
> question is what source address this is. if you look
> from the packet format, will this the source IP
> address (i.e. for ping, telnet, ftp etc) or what's
> this?
>
> also in a routing process, you can also use a standard
> access-list to specify a routing update ( for route
> ridistribution etc.), then it will be routing
> protocol-specific. i.e. in OSPF update, LSA field has
> a LINK ID, will the route map will call the
> access-list 1, and access list will check the Link ID?
>
>
> as always, any help will be greatly appreciated
>
>
> regards
>
>
> michael
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:15 GMT-3