From: tang bing (tang_bing@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Feb 07 2002 - 14:02:46 GMT-3
Why I don't see a reason below ?
--- Xuan.Sun@Seagate.com wrote:
> Eventually, I made it work.
>
> 1) Assign ring number in each TRcrf VLAN you have
> created. Do not use
> "auto". The reason is below.
> 2) Assign the TO 0 in R1 to TRcrf 100, TO 0 in R2 to
> TRcrf 110. (this two
> TRcrf must be in the same TRbrf).
> 3) In each TO 0, put "multiring all". The
> "source-bridge" is not necessary.
>
> Now you can ping from one router to another router.
>
>
>
>
>
> Manny Gonzalez <manny@nyp.org>@groupstudy.com on
> 01/29/2002 08:58:24 AM
>
> Please respond to Manny Gonzalez <manny@nyp.org>
>
> Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
>
>
> To: li jian hua <jasonli@cisco.com>
> cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>
> Subject: Re: about 3920 VLAN configuration
>
>
> SRT or SRB for the rings (CRF's) ??
>
> li jian hua wrote:
> >
> > HI,
> > First see the attached file.
> > In the figure,One TrBRF 100 and two TrCRF have
> been created on a 3920
> switch.
> > The TrBRF 100 is the parent of the two TrCRF.
> > TrCRF 110 contains port 1.
> > TrCRF 115 contains port 2.
> > Port 1 is link to router1's token ring
> interface(ip is 172.16.115.1).
> > Port 2 is link to router2's token ring
> interface(ip is 172.16.115.2).
> >
> > Question:
> >
> > ping from 172.16.115.1 to 172.16.115.2,the
> result is succeed or
> failure?
> >
> > Please help to analysis.
> >
> > rgds/jason
> >
> > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type
> image/gif which had a name
> of 3920.gif"; x-mac-type="47494666";
> x-mac-creator="4A565752]
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:14 GMT-3