From: Thomas Larus (tlarus@xxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Feb 02 2002 - 15:40:01 GMT-3
The last task on the OSPF Lab in the Lab Kit requires that you use
summary-address 152.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 and summary-addr 152.1.2.0
255.255.255.0 on r6, and then limit the redistribution of routes from
the OSPF domain to the IGRP backbone.
Unfortunately, when I try using the summary-address command, it does not
enter the routes into my r6 routing table at all. There are more
specific routes, but not the summary routes. I tried using area range
on other routers, and I seemed to have some success briefly with one of
the routes, but that is not the solution used by the authors.
There^Rs probably some really basic reason why this is not working the
way it worked for the authors. I was a little skeptical about the idea
of using summary-address to summarize OSPF non-external routes so that
they could be redistributed into IGRP. I thought you could only use
summary-address to summarize external routes that had come INTO OSPF
from another routing protocol.
BTW, how come there is so little discussion of these Hutnik and Saterlee
Lab Kit scenarios. I know the authors supplied answers, but there are a
few glaring mistakes that you would think we would be discussing.
Besides, people have the answers to CCBootcamp scenarios, too, but that
doesn^Rt stop people from talking about the scenarios a lot.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:14 GMT-3