RE: Frame Relay Map Vs Inverse Arp !

From: Przemyslaw Karwasiecki (karwas@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Feb 06 2002 - 20:04:46 GMT-3


   
Jose,

I agree with you that it will be nice if implied, specific:
"no frame-relay inverse-arp ip <DLCI>" would be inserted
automagically into config.

But because is this is a implied default it is not shown
in a config even when you put it there manually:

r2#sh run int s 0
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 148 bytes
!
interface Serial0
 ip address 10.10.1.2 255.255.0.0
 encapsulation frame-relay
 frame-relay map ip 10.10.1.3 201
 frame-relay lmi-type cisco
end

r2#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
r2(config)#int s 0
r2(config-if)#no frame-relay inverse-arp ip 201
r2(config-if)#^Z
r2#sh run int s 0
00:43:15: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console
r2#sh run int s 0
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 148 bytes
!
interface Serial0
 ip address 10.10.1.2 255.255.0.0
 encapsulation frame-relay
 frame-relay map ip 10.10.1.3 201
 frame-relay lmi-type cisco
end

r2#

Interesting, isn't it?

Przemek

On Wed, 2002-02-06 at 12:29, JOSE ANGEL MARTINEZ DE LA VARA wrote:
> Yes, I also think we have to test a little bit more befored being sure about
> this. Perhaps the dynamic entry you are having comes from the inarp request
> sent by the other side of the pvc. I'll test on this tomorrow too.
>
> But after all, don't you think that if a frame relay map disables inverse
> arp then it would appear in the show runn output? I mean, the 'no
> frame-relay inverse-arp' statement should appear when the frame relay map is
> entered, don't you think so?
>
> Thanks
>
> Jose Angel



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:14 GMT-3