From: Bill Reilly (william.j.reilly@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Feb 05 2002 - 00:24:23 GMT-3
I see what I did. Thanks....
So the correction should be under the EIGRP process you want to filter
the network from use the distrubute-list 1 out ospf 64, yes?
fwells12 wrote:
>This is wrong Bill.
>
>If you use your command 'distribute-list 1 out eigrp 65505' under the OSPF
>process it will use access list 1 to filter routes from EIGRP into OSPF.
>Not from OSPF into EIGRP...
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Bill Reilly" <william.j.reilly@verizon.net>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 1:52 PM
>Subject: Re: filtering redistribution.....
>
>
>>Steve,
>>
>>Look at page 779 for using route filtering in OSPF processes. Because
>>OSPF dose not use the interface as its destination, you need to use the
>>protocol name in your distribute-list command and you can only use the
>>out keyword. Then add the routes you want to filter in an access-list
>>referenced in the distribute-list.
>>
>>i.e. distribute-list 1 out eigrp 65505
>>
>>access-list 1 permit "the routes you want to send into eigrp"
>>the deny all will prevent the rest from being redistributed.
>>
>>Bill
>>
>>Bill
>>
>>Steven Weber wrote:
>>
>>>In Doyle, pages 726-730 He is showing how EIGRP 1 is receiving summary
>>>
>routes
>
>>>that come up as external. The reason for this is because OSPF is learning
>>>these summary routes and redistributing them back into EIGRP 1. I wanted
>>>
>to
>
>>>try to filter these summary routes out of EIGRP 1 on the redistributing
>>>router. I tried filtering them from coming into e0 and I also tried
>>>
>filtering
>
>>>them from going out of e1 but in both cases the summary routes still
>>>
>showed up
>
>>>in EIGRP 1. Can someone please explain to me what I'm doing wrong and
>>>
>what I
>
>>>should be doing in order to filter these summary routes accurately.
>>>TIA
>>>Steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:11 GMT-3